hoteltech.news August 28, 2026
Revenue & DistributionPublished August 7, 20261 min read

RevPAR records can hide profit loss, here's what to watch instead

JSBy Joan SanzCurated by Joan Sanz. · August 7, 2026 · Follow on LinkedIn
Voice reading · ~2 min

You've seen it happen: a hotel hits a RevPARRevPARRevenue per available room blends price and occupancy into one figure. You get it by multiplying ADR by occupancy, or dividing room revenue by the rooms available. It is the headline metric for hotel performance. record and the director declares victory. Then the numbers land on the P&L and profit is flat or down. How?

Because RevPAR measures occupancy times rate, but it tells you nothing about what you actually kept. A hotel selling rooms at higher rates to a low-margin segment, or bleeding money on commissionsComisiónCommission is the percentage a channel keeps for each booking it brings the hotel. It is the cost of selling through an OTA and usually runs from 15 to 25 percent, more in niche channels. Cutting dependence on high co... and distribution costs, will post stellar RevPAR while the bottom line collapses. The metric answered one question well: are we pricing and filling the rooms? It failed at another: are we making money?

The problem runs deeper than semantics. Revenue managers trained to chase RevPAR optimization can inadvertently steer a hotel toward volume over profitability, or toward channels that look good on the surface but erode margins. OTAOTAAn online travel agency is a channel that sells accommodation and travel online in exchange for a commission. Booking.com and Expedia are the biggest. They bring volume and visibility, but charge commissions that eat... deals, last-minute discounts to fill nights, group bookings with wafer-thin spreads, they all pump RevPAR. They don't pump profit.

What matters now is seeing beyond the headline number. Profit per available room, cost per acquisitionCPACost per acquisition is the model where you only pay when the booking happens, like a commission. It shifts the risk to the channel, which only earns if it sells, and that is why it tends to cost more per booking than... by channel, and the spread between what you sell and what you keep. These three force you to ask better questions: which segments and channels are actually profitable? Where are the leaks? What price floor protects margin without losing volume? That's not spreadsheet busywork. That's the difference between a hotel that looks busy and one that makes money.

Quick questions

Why can RevPAR hit a record while profit falls?
RevPAR (revenue per available room) measures occupancy and rate but ignores costs, commissions, and distribution margins. A hotel selling rooms at high rates through expensive channels or to low-margin segments can post record RevPAR while actual profit stays flat or drops.
What's a better metric than RevPAR to track profit?
Profit per available room (ProfitPAR or similar) shows what you actually keep after all costs. It forces you to see the real margin, not just the headline revenue.
How do channel commissions hide in RevPAR?
RevPAR counts gross revenue. An OTA booking at €100 with 18% commission delivers €82 net, but RevPAR treats it as €100. Comparing channels by raw RevPAR masks which ones actually pay.
Should revenue managers stop chasing RevPAR?
No, but they should chase profit first. RevPAR is useful for occupancy and pricing strategy, but it must be checked against margin by segment and channel to avoid chasing volume that eats profit.
Which three KPIs should replace RevPAR focus?
Profit per available room, cost per acquisition by channel, and net margin by segment. Together they show which bookings, channels, and customer types actually drive profitability, not just revenue.

Was this article useful?

Enjoyed this? Share Hotel Tech News

X LinkedIn WhatsApp

The daily brief

The hotel tech brief, in your inbox

PMS, revenue, distribution, AI and travel tech startups. One sharp email a day. Free.

The brief hoteliers who buy technology read every morning.

Editorial content by Hotel Tech News. It may contain errors. Verify anything important with the original source.

This article may mention third-party products, companies or services for informational purposes. Hotel Tech News does not endorse them and is not responsible for them or for what they offer. Editorial content curated by the Hotel Tech News team.

Produced with AI assistance and editorial review.

← Back to Hotel Tech News

Hotel Tech News is an independent digest. It is not the official site of any brand mentioned. Content is editorial and curated, and may contain errors. Verify anything important with the original source. This is not financial, legal or investment advice. Some links or blocks may be sponsored or affiliate. Trademarks belong to their owners. You can unsubscribe at any time with one click, and you can request access or deletion of your data at hoteltech.news/contact.

⚙ Admin